Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26482 (JHR)

MD. ALAMGIR ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8676/2026 · 2026-09-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:28097] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8676 of 2026 ------ Md. Alamgir Alam, aged about 31 years, Son of Rustam Ali, resident of Village- Srinathpur, P.O.- Kasba, P.S.- Mahagama, District- Godda, Jharkhand. ... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-17-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the Customer Service Centre Operator has cheated five persons and got Rs.3,30,290/-transferred from their account, without their consent by obtaining their thumb impressions. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.06.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.09.2026 Amar/