KULDEEP SOOD AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/17476/2026 · 2026-10-06
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26475 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26475 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.17476 of 2026
Decided on: 6th October, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kuldeep Sood and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Sameer Miyan and Mr. Saurav,
Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations (Annexure P-4 Colly.) seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/ competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025
2 submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
3.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 06, 2026
Judge Mukesh