UJJWAL UPADHYAY ALIAS UJJWAL KUMAR UPADHYAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8686/2026 · 2026-09-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26474 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26474 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:28208] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8686 of 2026
Ujjwal Upadhyay @ Ujjwal Kumar Upadhyay, Age- 21 Years, S/o- Ramesh Upadhyay, R/o- LOtaneya, P.O- Kajrat Nawadih, P.S- Hussainabad, Sawari, Dist- Palamau, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw , Adv. For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl. PP
02 / 17.09.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 126/2026 instituted under Section 115(2), 309(4) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted motorcycle and mobile phone of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 10 of the bail application. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on TIP, as mentioned in para 09 of the Bail Application, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 08.06.2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner
during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM at Palamu in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 126/2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 17.09.2026
Smita/-