CRWP-7703 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (113) LUKMAN AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. issuance of directions to liberty of the petitioners. 2. are in a live is further submitted that they 26.06.2026 (Annexure P 3. book. 4. currently m children from his wife and petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband -1- 7703-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LUKMAN AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for the issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in a live-in relationship and apprehend danger to their life and liberty. It is further submitted that they had also submitted a representation dated 26.06.2026 (Annexure P-3), but the same has not been looked into. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the paper Admittedly, both petitioner No. 1 currently married to other individuals and children from his wife and petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7703-2026 Date of Decision:- 02.07.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. The present petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for the respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners in relationship and apprehend danger to their life and liberty. It had also submitted a representation dated 3), but the same has not been looked into. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the paper petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No.2 are arried to other individuals and petitioner No. 1 has three children from his wife and petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband. 02.07.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents The present petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for the respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners in relationship and apprehend danger to their life and liberty. It had also submitted a representation dated Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the paper and petitioner No.2 are petitioner No. 1 has three . MANJU 2026.07.07 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7703 There is an averment in the petition that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had died, however, despite repeated and specific q when petitioner No. 1 had married earlier and when his wife had expired, learned counsel for the petitio there is not even a single averment that petitioner No. 2 has initiated any proceedings for separation or divorce or has filed an husband. On a specific query put by this Court as to since when the petitioners had been living in a live of income, learned counsel for the pet and no averment in this regard has been made in the petition. 5. Rather, the present petition apparently appears to be a crude attempt to abuse the proces relationship. It also needs to be considered that such actions on the part of the petitioners are extremely detrimental to the future of the children they already have, apart from ruining the matrimonial liv Furthermore, there is no material on record, except for the bald averment in the petition, to establish that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had died petitioner No.2 has initiated any proceeding against her husband. 6. correct factual position and apparently seems to be concealing more than revealing what is required to be disclosed, coupled with the fact that there is no apparent threat perception and that the proces -2- 7703-2026 There is an averment in the petition that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had however, despite repeated and specific q when petitioner No. 1 had married earlier and when his wife had expired, learned counsel for the petitioners had no answer to the same and more so there is not even a single averment that petitioner No. 2 has initiated any dings for separation or divorce or has filed an On a specific query put by this Court as to since when the petitioners had been living in a live-in relationship , learned counsel for the petitioners could not respond to the and no averment in this regard has been made in the petition. The petition does not disclose any cogent threat perception. Rather, the present petition apparently appears to be a crude attempt to abuse the process of law so as to cover up their own promiscuous relationship. It also needs to be considered that such actions on the part of the petitioners are extremely detrimental to the future of the children they already have, apart from ruining the matrimonial liv Furthermore, there is no material on record, except for the bald averment in the petition, to establish that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had died petitioner No.2 has initiated any proceeding against her husband. In light of the above, since the petition does not disclose the correct factual position and apparently seems to be concealing more than revealing what is required to be disclosed, coupled with the fact that there is no apparent threat perception and that the proces There is an averment in the petition that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had however, despite repeated and specific queries by this Court as to when petitioner No. 1 had married earlier and when his wife had expired, ners had no answer to the same and more so there is not even a single averment that petitioner No. 2 has initiated any dings for separation or divorce or has filed any complaint against her On a specific query put by this Court as to since when the in relationship and what is their source itioners could not respond to the same and no averment in this regard has been made in the petition. The petition does not disclose any cogent threat perception. Rather, the present petition apparently appears to be a crude attempt to s of law so as to cover up their own promiscuous relationship. It also needs to be considered that such actions on the part of the petitioners are extremely detrimental to the future of the children they already have, apart from ruining the matrimonial lives of two other persons. Furthermore, there is no material on record, except for the bald averment in the petition, to establish that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had died and petitioner No.2 has initiated any proceeding against her husband. f the above, since the petition does not disclose the correct factual position and apparently seems to be concealing more than revealing what is required to be disclosed, coupled with the fact that there is no apparent threat perception and that the process of law cannot be abused There is an averment in the petition that the wife of petitioner No. 1 had ueries by this Court as to when petitioner No. 1 had married earlier and when his wife had expired, ners had no answer to the same and more so there is not even a single averment that petitioner No. 2 has initiated any y complaint against her On a specific query put by this Court as to since when the and what is their source same The petition does not disclose any cogent threat perception. Rather, the present petition apparently appears to be a crude attempt to s of law so as to cover up their own promiscuous relationship. It also needs to be considered that such actions on the part of the petitioners are extremely detrimental to the future of the children they es of two other persons. Furthermore, there is no material on record, except for the bald averment in and f the above, since the petition does not disclose the correct factual position and apparently seems to be concealing more than revealing what is required to be disclosed, coupled with the fact that there is s of law cannot be abused MANJU 2026.07.07 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7703 to cover up a promiscuous relationship, this Court does not find any merit in the present petition. 7. minor children petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband. Thus, the future of four children is also at stake. The petitioners are under a legal and moral obligation to ensure the welfare and future of these children. However, such responsibility d case. 8. exemplary costs. However, in the interest of justice and keeping in view the welfare of the minor children, the petitioners future of the children by opening R of each child and depositing a sum of at least such account for a period of at least one year. 9. liberty of the petitioners July 02, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: -3- 7703-2026 to cover up a promiscuous relationship, this Court does not find any merit in the present petition. Another aspect that requires consideration is the future of the minor children as petitioner No. 1 has three children from hi petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband. Thus, the future of four children is also at stake. The petitioners are under a legal and moral obligation to ensure the welfare and future of these children. However, such responsibility does not appear to be reflected in their conduct in the present Consequently, the petition deserves to be dismissed with exemplary costs. However, in the interest of justice and keeping in view the welfare of the minor children, the petitioners ure of the children by opening Recurring of each child and depositing a sum of at least such account for a period of at least one year. Needless to say that the State of the petitioners. July 02, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No to cover up a promiscuous relationship, this Court does not find any merit Another aspect that requires consideration is the future of the petitioner No. 1 has three children from his first wife, and petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband. Thus, the future of four children is also at stake. The petitioners are under a legal and moral obligation to ensure the welfare and future of these children. However, such oes not appear to be reflected in their conduct in the present Consequently, the petition deserves to be dismissed with exemplary costs. However, in the interest of justice and keeping in view the welfare of the minor children, the petitioners are directed to secure the ecurring Deposit accounts in the name of each child and depositing a sum of at least ₹5,000/- per month in each such account for a period of at least one year. is bound to protect the life and (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE to cover up a promiscuous relationship, this Court does not find any merit Another aspect that requires consideration is the future of the s first wife, and petitioner No. 2 has one child from her husband. Thus, the future of four children is also at stake. The petitioners are under a legal and moral obligation to ensure the welfare and future of these children. However, such oes not appear to be reflected in their conduct in the present Consequently, the petition deserves to be dismissed with exemplary costs. However, in the interest of justice and keeping in view the are directed to secure the eposit accounts in the name per month in each is bound to protect the life and MANJU 2026.07.07 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document