Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26471 (KAR)

RUDRESHNAIK R v. NIL

MFA/4272/2026 · 2026-07-06

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33633-DB MFA No. 4272 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4272 OF 2026(GW) BETWEEN: 1. RUDRESHNAIK R., AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, R/O ERAJJANAHATTI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 501. REPRESENTED BY NEXT BY NATURAL FATHER 2. RAJANAIK S/O NARASSANAIK AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST R/O ERAJJANAHATTI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT-577501. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T.C., ADVOCATE) AND: NIL …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33633-DB MFA No. 4272 of 2026 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47 (a) OF GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:30.01.2026 PASSED IN G AND WC NO.28/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITRADURGA, DISMISSING THE PETITION UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present appeal under Section 47(e) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, has been filed impugning the Judgment and order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Chitradurga, in G & WC No.28/2025, wherein the appellant's prayer seeking permission to sell the property of the minor, who is 16 years, has been rejected. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33633-DB MFA No. 4272 of 2026 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the entire appeal paper, we find no reason to interfere with the well considered order passed by the Family Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14