( 2026:JHHC:28031 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2542 of 2023 ------ 1. Deepshikha Mishra @ Deep Sikha Mishra @ Deepsikha Mishra, aged about 29 years, wife of Ravi Shankar Mishra, daughter of Ravindranath Tiwary, resident of villge –Hutup, Near Shalini Hospital, Rukka Road, P.O. –Irba, P.S. – Ormanjhi, District –Ranchi, Jharkhand, presently residing at Village and Post –Ataula, P.S. –Meral, District –Garhwa. 2. Surajdeo Pandey @ Suraj Dev Pandey, aged about 45 years, son of Madan Pandey, resident of Near T.V. Tower, Bairiya, P.O. and P.S. –Suduna, District –Palamau. 3. Aman Kumar Pandey @ Aman Pandey @ Tinku, aged about 27 years, son of Harinandan Pandey, resident of Village Kanke Kala, P.O. and P.S. –Patan, District –Palamau. 4. Pankaj Kumar Pandey @ Pawan Pandey @ Pankaj Pandey, aged about 36 years, son of Uday Nath Pandey, resident of Village –Kanke Kala, P.O. and P.S. –Patan, District – Palamau. 5. Sudhanshu Kumar Tiwary @ Sudhansu Tiwary, aged about 20 years, son of Chandrashekhar Tiwary, resident of Village –Chechariya, Post –Ataula, P.S. Meral, District –Garhwa. 6. Munjikesh Tiwary @ Munjikesh Tiwari @ Munjikesh Kumar Tiwari @ Munjkesh Tiwari, aged about 34 years, son of Ravindranath Tiwary. 7. Chandrashekhar Tiwary @ Chandra Sekhor Tiwary, aged about 45 years, son of Onkar Nath Tiwari 8. Praveen Kumar Mishra @ Praveen Mishra, aged about 25 years, son of Mathura Mishra Petitioner No. 6 to 8 are residents of Ataula, P.O. and P.S. Meral, District –Garhwa. 9. Umanand Pandey @ Nanhak Pandey @ Umakant Pandey, aged about 50 years, son of Madan Pandey, resident of Kakekala, P.O. and P.S. –Patan, District –Palamau. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate ------ Order No.09 Dated- 16.09.2026 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners’ in-spite of repeated calls. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this criminal miscellaneous petition as there is no merit in this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16.09.2026 Sonu-