115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35792-2026 DECIDED ON: 06.07.2026 SAMIR SINGH @ SAMIR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Ms. Navjot Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1. Present 2nd petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.61 dated 08.03.2026, Under Sections 109, 191(3), 190 of BNS 2023 (corresponding to Sections: 307, 148, 149 of IPC) and sections 25, 27 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station City Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran. 2. On perusal of the record, it is noticed that petitioner's first petition seeking anticipatory bail, i.e. CRM-M-21347-2026, was dismissed on merits, vide order dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P-3). 3. Co-accused-Jagroop Singh alias Gujjar, was not attributed any specific role in the occurrence, whereas present petitioner is specifically alleged to have fired gunshots, resulting in injuries to members of the opposite party. In view of the distinct and distinguishable roles attributed to the two accused, concession of interim anticipatory bail was granted to co-accused Jagroop Singh alias Gujjar by this Court, LAVISHA 2026.07.06 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh CRM-M-35792-2026 -2- vide order dated 18.05.2026 passed in CRM-M-28060-2026 (Annexure P-4). 4. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner for the second time, seeking anticipatory bail. In the absence of any change in circumstances subsequent to the dismissal of the earlier petition on merits, instant petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, present petition stands dismissed. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 06.07.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.07.06 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh