IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMP(M) No. 309 of 2025 Date of Decision: 06.10.2026 __________________________________________________________________ Reena Devi …...Applicant-appellant. Versus Sandeep Kant Sharma ....Non-applicant/Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________________________ For the applicant/appellant: Mr. Ashwani Dhiman, Advocate. For the non-applicant/ Respondent: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate . ___________________________________________________________________ Ajay Mohan Goel, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that the applicant- appellant be allowed to withdraw this application but with liberty to pursue remedies, which may be available to her against the respondent. Though, the request has been opposed by the learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent but we allow the applicant-appellant to withdraw this application with liberty, as prayed for. 2. We clarify that the liberty granted by us should not be construed as if we have given any liberty to the applicant-appellant to agitate the order, which has been -2- challenged by way of these proceedings afresh. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel), Judge (Yogesh Jaswal), Judge October 06, 2026 (meera)