IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47653 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ajit Yadav Son of Acchchhelal Yadav R/O Village- Paithan Patti, P.S.- Manjhagarh @ Manjha, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 Heard Mrs. Kumari Sujata Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Adarsh Ranjan for the informant beside the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Manjhargarh P.S. Case No. 388 of 2025 for the offence under sections 126(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. lodged on 29.10.2025 by the informant, Kiran Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on petty dispute, bursting of crackers, this petitioner assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant causing injury. 4. Later, Abhishek Yadav assaulted with knife as her husband rushed to the spot, Achchhelal Yadav assaulted him on the neck while Ranjit assaulted the informant on head with knife, on the left side of the neck and hand and Suganti Yadav Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47653 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 assaulted with lathi. This led to the F.I.R. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the assault on the neck of the informant’s husband have been assigned to Ranjeet Yadav and only allegation against him is giving farsa blow. 6. Learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer and has taken this Court to the F.I.R. to show that there is specific allegation against this petitioner of giving farsa blow on the head and has further taken this Court to the Learned Sessions Judge’s order to show that the injury has been found grievous in nature. 7. Taking into account, the submissions of the parties aforesaid, no relief can be extended to the petitioner. 8. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T