Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26465 (AP)

Arasada Srinivasa Naidu s/o Late Ramu Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its

WP/27630/2015 · 2026-02-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010626542015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27630 OF 2015 Between: 1. Arasada Srinivasa Naidu s/o Late Ramu Naidu, aged about 44 years, presently working as Branch Manager, DCCB Limited, Vizianagaram. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Co-operative & Marketing Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Special Commissioner, Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad. 3. The District Cooperative Officer Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 4. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Society, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram Distriut. 5. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District. 6. Ravivalasa Primary Agricultural Coop Society Limited, Rep. by its Person-in-charge, Ravivalasa, Vizianagaram District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more 2 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned Memorandum issued by the 3rd respondent dt.8-6-2015 bearing Rc.No.2464/2014-C (Coop) for initiation of action against the petitioner herein on the basis of the enquiry held U/Sec. 51 of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 into the affairs of the 6th respondent society as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 35874 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceeding pursuant to the impugned Memorandum issued by the 2nd respondent dated 8.6.2015 bearing Rcf.No.2464/2014-C(coop) in so far as the petitioner herein is concerned Counsel for the Petitioner: P L RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.27630 OF 2015 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned Memorandum issued by the 3rd respondent dt.8-6-2015 bearing Rc.No.2464/2014-C (Coop) for initiation of action against the petitioner herein on the basis of the enquiry held U/Sec. 51 of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 into the affairs of the 6th respondent society as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same, and to pass…..” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri P.L.Rao, clearly submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4 There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:06.02.2026 Rns 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.27630 of 2015 Date:06.02.2026 Rns