- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33716 WP No. 41262 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 41262 OF 2017 (L-RES) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD., KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, KUDLUR, KUSHALNAGAR-571234, KODAGU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL A., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. JANAKI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O. RAMESH, 2. SMT. ALAMELAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O. SOMANNA, 3. SMT. LAXMI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O. THIMAPPA, 4. SMT. R.GOWRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O. RAMESH, 5. SMT. LAXMI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O. PRAKASH, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33716 WP No. 41262 of 2017 6. SMT. KAMALA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, W/O. YOGI, 7. SMT. R.PADMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O. RAMESH, 8. SMT. N.SAVITHA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D/O. NAGARAJ, 9. SMT. YASHODA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O. RAVI, 10. SMT. CHANDRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O. NIRVANI, ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED BY SRI. M.G.AIYAPPA, GENERAL SECRETARY, (KIPLU) DR.RADHAKRISHNA LAYOUT, 4TH BLOCK, KUSHALNAGAR, KODAGU-571234. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LASHMISHREE B., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.A.APPAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R10) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33716 WP No. 41262 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The matter was listed on 30.06.2026. On that day also, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. For appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the matter was ordered to be listed today. It was also made clear that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for its non-prosecution. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84