Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26460 (PNJ)

AMIT ARJAN MIRCHANDANI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/24609/2026 · 2026-07-06

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 314 CRM-M-24609-2026 Date of decision:06.07.2026 Amit Arjan Mirchandani ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana & Another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA. Present: Mr. Gurjeet Singh Kaura, Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Trehan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Damanjeet Singh Sangar, Advocate for respondent No.2 . ... MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL). 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No.330, dated 22.07.2021, registered under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC (now under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS, 2023), at Police Station Sector-5 Panchkula, Haryana along with all subsequent proceedings arising thereform, on the basis of compromise dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) 2 . This Court vide order dated 04.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.07 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24609-2026 -2- 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panchkula and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 22.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.330, dated 22.07.2021, registered under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC ( now under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS, 2023), at Police Station Sector-5 Panchkula, Haryana along with all subsequent proceedings arising thereform, on the basis of compromise dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) is quashed qua the petitioner. (MANISHA BATRA) 06.07.2026 JUDGE harjeet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.07 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document