104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** COCP-1332-2026 Date of decision : 22.04.2026 Ranjit Singh and another ... Petitioners Versus Ankush Garg ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 27.01.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the requisite Misal number has been supplied to the petitioners and the said Misal number is 10 of 2008 and the same has wrongly been stated in the writ petition as Misal no.1 of 2008. It is submitted that the respondent has Misal no.1 also and the same can also be supplied to the petitioners. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that since Misal no.10 of 2008 pertains to the petitioners and the same has been supplied to the petitioners, thus, due compliance has been made and the present contempt petition be disposed of. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE April 22, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.23 14:00 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment