Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2646 (ALL)

SANTRAM v. ANIL GAUTAM AND 9 OTHERS

A227/6387/2026 · 2026-05-06

Vikas Budhwar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6387 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a writ, order or direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide the Original Suit No. 391 of 2024 (Santram Vs. Anil Gautam and others) pending before it within stipulated time, as may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to theCivil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide the Original Suit No. 391 of 2024 (Santram Vs. Anil Gautam and others), in accordance with law, expeditiously as per roster, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal impediment. May 7, 2026 Ashu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Shamim Khan, Shadab Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Santram .....Petitioner(s) Anil Gautam And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad