APHC010627162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12225/2025 Between: 1. SYED GOHAR JAN, W/O JAMAL BASHA, AGEDABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O NEAR SADHIKHANA,EDIGAMITTA, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAMDISTRICT. 2. SYED JAMAL BASHA, S/O MOHIDDINSA SAHEB,AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O NEAR SADHIKHANA,EDIGAMITTA,DISTRICT.SINGARAYAKONDA PRAKASAM 3. SYED SULTAN, S/O JAMAL BASHA, AGED ABOUT 24YEARS, R/O NEAR SADHIKHANA, EDIGAMITTA,SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SYED DILSHAD, W/O KALESHA VALI, AGED ABOUT45 YEARS, R/O MULAGUNTAPADU VILLAGE,SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. SYED KALESHA VALI, S/O MOHIDDINSA SAHEB,AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O MULAGUNTAPADU VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.12225 of 2025 Dated 27.01.2026 2. SD KHASIMBI, W/O SHABEER, AGED ABOUT 27YEARS, R/O MULAGUNTAPADU VILLAGE,SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): SAI HARSHITH PULAPARTHI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. NANDAPANEEDI LIKHITHA SRI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on 25.11.2025, a direction was given by the learned Single Judge of this Court dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the learned Trial Court, unless their presence is specifically required by the learned Trial Court. The learned counsel for the petitioners requests that the said direction may be made absolute, considering that the presence of the petitioners is dispensed with unless their presence is specifically required by the learned Trial Court in C.C.No.267 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.12225 of 2025 Dated 27.01.2026 Magistrate of First Class (Junior Division), Singarayakonda, Prakasam District. 3. After thorough investigation, charge sheet has been filed. As many as seven witnesses have given statements under Section 161 of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ to the investigating officer/L.W.8 against the accused attracting allegations punishable under Sections 498(A) of ‘the IPC’ and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There are no merits in the Criminal Petition to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.267 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Junior Division), Singarayakonda, Prakasam District. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the learned Trial Court. The learned Trial Court can secure the presence of the petitioners as and when required. 5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 27.01.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.12225 of 2025 Dated 27.01.2026 78 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12225 of 2025 Date: 27.01.2026 RSI 5 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.12225 of 2025 Dated 27.01.2026 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.12225 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 27.01.2026 Dr.YLR,J I.A.No.01 of 2025 Heard. Dispensed with for the present. _________ Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.12225 of 2025 The Criminal Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order). _________ Dr.YLR,J RSI