Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26444 (KAR)

SHOBHA JAGADISH v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/36599/2025 · 2026-07-01

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32710 WP No. 36599 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 36599 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SHOBHA JAGADISH, W/O JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT SHARAVATHI NILAYA, 5TH MAIN ROAD, SANCHAR NAGAR, TELECOM LAYOUT, THANEESANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 077. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.S.PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 3. THAHASILDAR, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32710 WP No. 36599 of 2025 4. RAJRAO, S/O SURYANARAYAN RAO, AGE MAJOR, MUGBAL VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK - 562 114, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K.S.UDAY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4; SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.10.2025 (SIGNED ON 30.10.2025) PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN R.P NO.181/2024 AT ANNEXURE A ALONG WITH RECTIFICATION ORDER DATED 18.11.2025 RECTIFYING THE SURVEY NO THEREIN AT ANNEXURE A1 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDER S, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 28.10.2025 in R.P. No. 181/2024 (Annexure - A) and rectification order dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure - A1) and the order dated 02.02.2022 passed by respondent No. 2 in RA.(HO) 218/2020 (Annexure – B). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32710 WP No. 36599 of 2025 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful examination of the material on record indicates that the mutation entry has been made in terms of the registered sale deed dated 17.05.2004. 3. In that view of the matter since the suit in O.S. No. 1564/2004 is pending consideration before the competent civil court, it is open for the petitioner to establish a right over the property in question in a manner known to law. In that view of the matter, I conclude that no interference is called for in this petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28