IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-19763-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.07.2026 Union Territory Chandigarh through Chief Secretary and others ...Petitioners Versus Manmadha Rao Munduru and Anr. .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate, Additional Standing Counsel, U.T. Chandigarh, with Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Bahl, Advocate, Jr. Standing Counsel, U. T. Chandgarh for petitioners. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the ground of delay has been noticed but not decided, hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file review before Central Administrative Tribunal (for short the ‘Tribunal’) and with further liberty to file a fresh writ petition in case they are unsuccessful in the review petition. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. As the present writ petition has been disposed of with liberty to file a review, therefore if any contempt petition has been filed by the respondents for implementation of the same, the same be adjourned for a period of 15 days so as to allow the petitioners to file a review of the order, violation of which is being projected in the contempt petition. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE July 03, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) anil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes ANIL KUMAR 2026.07.07 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether reportable : No ANIL KUMAR 2026.07.07 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document