Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2644 (RAJ)

LALITESH W/O LATE SHRI PORAN SINGH v. PRAVESH KUMAR BAGHELA S/O SHRI OMPRAKASH BAGHELA,

CMA/2019/2023 · 2026-02-26

Uma Shanker Vyas

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9002] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2019/2023 1. Lalitesh W/o Late Shri Pooran Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Jharpura, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur. 2. Piyush S/o Late Shri Pooran Singh, Aged About 9 Years, Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Lalitesh W/o Late Shri Pooran Singh, R/o Village Jharpura, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur. 3. Diya D/o Late Pooran Singh, Aged About 7 Years, Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Lalitesh W/o Late Shri Pooran Singh, R/o Village Jharpura, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur. 4. Kiran Devi W/o Shri Bhura, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Village Jharpura, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur. 5. Bhura Alias Bhuri Singh S/o Gulab, Aged About 83 Years, R/o Village Jharpura, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur. ----Appellants Versus 1. Pravesh Kumar Baghela S/o Shri Omprakash Baghela, R/o Block Ayodhya Kunj Colony, Sainpau Road, Dholpur, Tehsil And District Dholpur. 2. United India Insurance Company Limited Service, Through Divisional Manger, United India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, 1, Ashok Circle Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. Ms. Kriti Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Jain, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 26/02/2026 vihykFkhZ&nkosnkjku ¼vkxs ^^nkosnkj^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g vihy /kkjk 30 deZdkj {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 ¼vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1923^^ dgk tkosxk½ ds rgr fo}ku U;k;ky; vk;qDr deZpkjh {kfriwfrZ [2026:RJ-JP:9002] (2 of 4) [CMA-2019/2023] vf/kfu;e] /kkSyiqj] djkSyh eq[;ky; Hkjriqj }kjk izdj.k E.C.A.(F). No. 73/2018 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 26-04-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls nkosnkjksa dks dqy 7]78]560@& :i;s e; 12 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr izfrdj fnyk;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk nkosnkjku dk fuosnu gS fd nkosnkjksa dks 'kkfLr dh tks jkf'k fnyk;h gS] og vi;kZIr gSA e`rd dh vk; dks leqfpr :i ls vk; gkfu dh x.kuk djrs le; fopkj esa ugha fy;k x;k gS]s vUr esa izfrdj jkf'k dks vi;kZIr gksuk crkrs gq, ;Fkksfpr :i ls c<k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ&chek dEiuh dk fuosnu gS fd vihykFkhZ }kjk fy;s x;s vk/kkj rF;ksa ds laca/k esa gSa] ftu ij fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk miyC/k lkexzh ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA ^^vf/kfu;e&1923^^ dh /kkjk&30 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj fof/k dk lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr gksus ij gh ;g ;g vihy iks"k.kh; gS] pwafd bl ekeys esa fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gS] vr% ^^vf/kfu;e&1923^^ dh /kkjk&30 ds izko/kku rFkk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Sujatha (2019) 11 SCC 514 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Sujatha (Supra) ds lqlaxr iSjk la[;k&9] 10] 11 rFkk 12 fuEukuqlkj gS& 9. At the outset, we may take note of the fact, being a settled principle, that the question as to whether the employee met with an accident, whether the accident occurred during the course of employment, whether it arose out of an employment, how and in what manner the accident occurred, who was negligent in causing the accident, whether there existed any relationship of employee and employer, what was the age and monthly salary of the employee, how many are the dependents of the deceased employee, the extent of disability caused to the employee due to injuries suffered in an accident, [2026:RJ-JP:9002] (3 of 4) [CMA-2019/2023] whether there was any insurance coverage obtained by the employer to cover the incident etc. are some of the material issues which arise for the just decision of the Commissioner in a claim petition when an employee suffers any bodily injury or dies during the course of his employment and he/his LRs sue/s his employer to claim compensation under the Act. 10. The afore-mentioned questions are essentially the questions of fact and, therefore, they are required to be proved with the aid of evidence. Once they are proved either way, the findings recorded thereon are regarded as the findings of fact. 11. The appeal provided under Section 30 of the Act to the High Court against the order of the Commissioner lie only against the specific orders set out in clause (a) to (e) of Section 30 of the Act with a further rider contained in first proviso to the Section that the appeal must involve substantial question of law. 12. In other words, the appeal provided under Section 30 of the Act to the High Court against the order of the Commissioner is not like a Regular First Appeal akin to Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 which can be heard both on facts and law. The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court to decide the appeal is confined only to examine the substantial questions of law arising in the case. mijksDr fu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fof/kd O;oLFkk rFkk vf/kfu;e&1923 dh /kkjk 30 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj Li"V gS fd fof/k dk lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr gksus ij gh vihy lquokbZ gsrq xzg.k dh tk ldrh gSA orZeku ekeys esa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk e`rd dh vk; ds laca/k esa izLrqr lk{; ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr vk; gkfu dh x.kuk djrs gq, izfrdj jkf'k fnyk;h gS] blh izdkj izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, 50]000@& :i;s dh 'kkfLr nkosnkjksa dks fnyk;h x;h gS] mijksDr nksuksa iz'u rF;ksa ds laca/k esa gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k egRoiw.kZ lk{; dks utjvankt dj viuk fu"d"kZ fn;k x;k gks vFkok tks rF; vfHkys[k ij Fks gh ugha] mu ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr euekuk fu.kZ; fn;k gks] ,slh fLFkfr vfHkys[k ij ugha gSA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku iz'u bl ekeys esa vUroZfyr ugha gS] bl izdkj U;kf;d fu.kZ; North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation ¼iwoksZDr½ esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk rFkk [2026:RJ-JP:9002] (4 of 4) [CMA-2019/2023] vf/kfu;e&1923 dh /kkjk&30 ds vuqlkj ;g vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ls [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA rnuqlkj vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 26-04-2023 dh iqf"V djrs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSaA fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks bl vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izsf"kr fd;k tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /86