Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2643 (UTT)

SAKET BHAMBRI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMB/223/2026 · 2026-04-09

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2554-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 9th April, 2026 Writ Petition (M/B) 223 of 2026 Saket Bhambri ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others -----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Shiv Bhatt and Ms. Kumkum Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State /respondents no. 1,5,6 & 7. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for respondents no. 2 & 3. Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India- respondent no.4. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent no. 8. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for respondent no. 9. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 1. The petition suffers from multifariousness and misjoinder of causes of action. It is dismissed with liberty to file afresh. 2. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 09.04.2026 Kaushal 1 2026:UHC:2554-DB 2