Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26422 (AP)

PRATHYUSHA ANUBHAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/9134/2022 · 2026-02-09

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010622932022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9134/2022 Between: 1.PRATHYUSHA ANUBHAM, W/O SRINIVASULU, AGED 35 YEARS, 25- A-B2, AKSHAYA APARTMENT, AKSHAYA COLONY, 2ND AVENUE, ANNA NAGAR, WESTERN EXTENSION, TIRUVALLUR, TAMIL NADU - 600101. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 2.TEJASWINI AKURATHI YAMINI SAL, W/O AKURATHI DINESH, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 7-137, SATHA PALEM STREET, KASIPALEM, BUCHIREDDYPALEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the case has become settled before the Lok Adalath. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 10.02.2026 VTS