Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.7681 of 2026
Bitu Rao …. Petitioner
Mr. P.P. Parida, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. S. K. Lenka, ASC
ABLAPL No.7682 of 2026
Chandan Chhatria …. Petitioner
Mr. P.P. Parida, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. S. K. Lenka, ASC
ABLAPL No.7684 of 2026
Amit Nag …. Petitioner
Mr. P.P. Parida, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. S. K. Lenka, ASC
And ABLAPL No.7689 of 2026
Roshan Badaik …. Petitioner
Mr. P.P. Parida, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. S. K. Lenka, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 15.07.2026
01.
1. All the ABLAPLs are taken up together for orders. p. 2
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and State.
3. Instant petitions have been filed under Section 482 BNSS by the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Jhirpani P.S. Case No.89 of 2026 on the grounds stated.
4. Recorded the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties. Gone through the FIR as at Annexure-1 and therein, the alleged incident has been described. Mr. Parida,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is altercation between the petitioners and others with the local police and ultimately, the FIR was lodged by the informant. It is informed to the Court that no member of the police force on duty at the relevant point of time received any serious injury. Mr. Lenka, learned ASC for the State informs the Court that the informant received an injury on his eye but stated to be simple in nature referring to the medical examination report received by him. The said report is produced along with the case diary. It is also informed to the Court by Mr. Parida, learned counsel that none of the petitioners is having any other criminal antecedent. Considering the circumstances under which the alleged occurrence took place and described in the FIR and thereafter, it was followed by altercation and tussle between the accused persons and the local police, this Court, though not in favour of entertaining their bail plea, is inclined to direct all to surrender before the learned court below for being released with suitable conditions.
5. Accordingly, it is ordered. p. 3
6. In the result, ABLAPLs are disposed of with the direction as aforesaid. In the event, the petitioners surrender before the learned court below in connection with Jhirpani P.S. Case No.89 of 2026 within a fortnight from today, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with one solvent surety for the like amount each with such other conditions imposed by learned court below. The petitioners, as further directed, shall furnish an undertaking at the local PS not to commit or involve themselves in similar mischief while on bail.
7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Tudu