- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33572 WP No. 6983 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6983 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SATEESH SOMAN S/O SOMAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NAVAYA NISARGA APARTMENT VARNASI MAIN ROAD, KANAKANAGAR, VARNASI, BANGALORE - 36. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAMAKRISHNA VERNEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI KAMALUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NEEMA W/O SATHEESH SOMAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 2. KUM. NANMA D/O SATHESH SOMAN AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN R/AT NO 291, NISHIMA, DASAPPA LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK, 1ST A MAIN, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHREYA S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SIJI MALAYIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33572 WP No. 6983 of 2022 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRL.MISC NO.30/2022 IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT-1 MAYOHALL AT BANGALORE AND CRL.MISC.NO.54/2022 IN THE COURT OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-F TO THE WRIT PETITION. QUASH ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.NO.30/2022 ON THE FILED OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT-1 MAYOHALL AT BANGALORE INITIATED UNDER SECTION 20(6) R/W 31 OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VOILANCE ACT 2005 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND G1 TO THE WRIT PETITION. QUASH ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN C.MIS NO.54/2022 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT,BANGALORE INITIATED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I.A., THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo stating that he has complied with order dated 19.06.2023 by transferring Rs.7,96,308/- to respondents. 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of above, petition is rendered infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33572 WP No. 6983 of 2022 3. Perusal of order sheet dated 19.06.2023 reveals that petitioner had sought liberty to challenge proceedings in Criminal Miscellaneous no.54/2022 on file of VI Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru in separate proceedings and subsisting challenge was only against order passed in Criminal Miscellaneous no.30/2022 by Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-I, Bangalore under Section 20 (6) read with Section 31 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Said challenge is rendered infructuous in view of payment of amount as per impugned order. In view of above, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19