IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9947 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar Jamwal ……...Petitioner Versus Union of India and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.2. __________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that present petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. October 05, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge