Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26414 (PNJ)

PRINCE SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/22100/2026 · 2026-07-07

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-22100-2026 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (209-A) CRM-M-22100-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 07.07.2026 Prince Singh ... Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (438 Cr.P.C.) in case bearing FIR No.0077 dated 09.06.2025 under Sections 21, 61, 85 of the NDPS Act (Section 29 NDPS Act added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 22.04.2026 in terms of the order dated 06.04.2026 (in CRM-M-18370-2026) passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the aforesaid orders and is not required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the interim order dated 22.04.2026 (passed in terms of the order dated 06.04.2026 in CRM-M-18370-2026) is made absolute. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.07 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM-M-22100-2026 (O & M) ::2:: However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The petition stands disposed of. July 07, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.07 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh