IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44450 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2026 Thana- Sahayak Khajanchi District- Purnia ====================================================== Jubbu @ Md. Juber Son of Md. Janeef @ Janeeb @ Janeeb Resident of Village -Muzaffar Ahmed Nagar PS- Sahayak Khazanchi Distt- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Mumtaz Uddin, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 189(4), 191(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 76, 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 23.02.2026 at 06:00 PM she was coming back home after selling bamboos, when petitioner teased her, hence she complained to his mother, thereafter petitioner along with Shoib and Md. Samir chased and entered her house and Shoib and Samir assaulted her by an iron rod causing injury on head and hand, further Samir also assaulted Nimmi by rod causing Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44450 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 fracture of left hand, thereafter neighbors admitted them in the hospital, but informant was discharged and Nimmi was admitted, further at 09:00 PM petitioner along with named accused persons came and petitioner assaulted Zenith by rod causing injury on head and Shoib snatched Rs. 10,500/-. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that the petitioner and the informant are neighbors, it is also submitted that from side of the petitioner Sahayak Khazanchi P. S. Case No. 67 of 2026 has been registered against the informant and her side, it is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow is not alleged to have been repeated. 5. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that if the allegation as alleged in the FIR is perused minutely, it would manifest that the occurrence took place at the behest of the petitioner as informant alleges that while she was coming back home, the petitioner teased her and when she complained to her mother, Shoib and Samir along with petitioner came to her house and assaulted Nimmi causing injury, it is also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44450 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 submitted that after the informant got discharged from the hospital and came back home, the petitioner again came to her house and assaulted Zenith causing injury on head which is a vital part of the body, it is further submitted that investigation in the case is continuing. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. This application stands rejected. Nitesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T