2026:JHHC:28040 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 820 of 2018 --------------- Mahiruddin Ansari, aged about 56 years, son of Late Ramzan Mian, resident of Prem Nagar Bill Bera, P.O Sonardih, P.S-Madhuban, District-Dhanbad ........Petitioner Versus 1. R.S. Mahapatra, Director Personnel, Bharat Coaking Coal Limited, Koiyla Nagar, Dhanbad, P.O-Saraidhela, P.S. Saraidhela, District- Dhanbad. 2. The State of Jharkhand ...... Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate Miss Rita Kumari, Advocate Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the OP-BCCL : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate Order No.09/Dated: 16th September, 2026 1. The present contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate violation of the order of this Court dated 10.11.2017 passed in W.P(S) No.3848 of 2011 whereby and whereunder a direction has been issued to the concerned respondents (opposite parties herein) to reinstate the petitioner from the date he was made to retire forcibly, i.e., on 01.07.2011 and to pay full back wages from the said date to the date of reinstatement with all consequential benefits in accordance with law and further to pay Rs.25,000/- by way of cost to the petitioner within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. 2. The matter was heard by this Court on several occasion and lastly on 05.08.2026 and on that day, the following order was passed by this Court: “1. Show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite parties stating inter alia particularly at paragraph-13 and 14 that a sum of Rs.65,64,092/- has been calculated and after being checked by the Internal Auditor, vetted by the Finance Department, the same has been credited in the account of the petitioner through RTGS on 25.07.2026. 2. Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the pensionery benefit is still to be paid. 3. Upon this, Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.1 has submitted that for getting the benefit of 2026:JHHC:28040 2 pension, some certain paraphernalia is to be furnished by the petitioner, which is available in the Sahaj form. 4. The opposite party no.1 is directed to supply the copy of said form within a week. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to fill up the said form within the further period of one week. 6. Accordingly, the matter is being posted after three weeks for filing compliance affidavit. 7. List on 02.09.2026.” 3. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the O.P No.1 on 03.09.2026 by serving a copy upon the learned counsel for the petitioner which is evident from the acknowledgement receipt as available in the very first page of the said supplementary affidavit. 4. Mr. Manish Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the O.P No.1 has submitted that the part of the order pertaining to release of the back wages amounting to Rs.65,64,092/- has already been credited to the bank account of the petitioner on 25.07.2026 through RTGS for which reference has been made in para-5 of the said supplementary affidavit. 5. The further submission has been made in paragraph-7 onwards that form in the shape of Sahaj Form was supplied to the petitioner on 12.08.2026 which was to be filled up by the petitioner for the purpose of getting benefit of PF and the pension. It has also been stated that for getting benefit of pension an equal share amount, i.e., Rs.8,60,187/- is to be deposited by the petitioner as a part of petitioner’s contribution, but the said amount has not been deposited. So far as the contribution of employer, i.e., M/s BCCL is concerned, an amount of Rs.8,77,103/- has already been deposited into CMPF Account No.34871915753 and an amount of Rs.2759/- has also been deposited separately as administrative charges into CMPF Account No.34871978156 on 01.09.2026. 6. The learned counsel appearing for O.P. No.1 has submitted that the moment Sahaj Form will be filled up and submitted before the O.P No.1, then the benefit of pension will be extended to the petitioner without any delay preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of submission of Sahaj Form by forwarding it to the concerned CMPF Office. So far as the disbursement of PF amount is concerned, the moment the part of the petitioner’s contribution will be deposited 2026:JHHC:28040 3 by the petitioner, the said PF amount will also be paid in favour of the petitioner without any delay. 7. The learned counsel for O.P. No. 1, therefore, has submitted that there has been substantial compliance with this Court's order, as the required payment portion of the contribution has already been deposited into the petitioner's respective CMPF account. 8. The learned counsel appearing for O.P No.1, therefore, has submitted that part of the direction pertaining to disbursement of back wages amounting to Rs.65,64,092/- has already been paid in favour of the petitioner through RTGS on 25.07.2026 and, as such, there is compliance of the direction passed by this Court. 9. At this juncture, Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner’s contribution for the purpose of disbursal of the said PF amount has already been deposited by the petitioner as also Sahaj Form has already been filled up and submitted before the authority concerned. 10. In view of the above, O.P No.1, being the employer, is directed to ensure that the PF amount will be transmitted in the bank account of the petitioner as per submission of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and if Sahaj Form has already been filled up by the petitioner, then the O.P No.1 will ensure the disbursement of the pensionary benefit in favour of the petitioner. 11. Let such exercise be completed by O.P No.1 within four weeks. 12. Considering the aforesaid, the instant contempt case is closed and disposed of. 13. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Dated:16.09.2026 Sudhir