KONDETI UDAY BHASKAR, HYDERABAD. v. STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR.
CRLRC/682/2017 · 2026-02-05
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26409 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26409 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010631192017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 682/2017 Between:
1. KONDETI UDAY BHASKAR, HYDERABAD.,, SOFTWARE ENGINEER, 0/O. UNITED HEALTH GROUP INFORMATION SERVICES PVT. LTD., 5TH, 6TH AND PART 7TH OFFICE LEVEL, BUILDING NO. 14, SUNDEW PROPERTIES, SEZ [MIND SPACE], APIIC LAYOUT, SURVEY NUMBER 64, HIGH TECH CITY, MADAPUR, HYDERABAD.PRESENT RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: UDAYA BHASKAR KONDETI, S/O.
K. KASI VISWANADHAM, SOFTWARE ENGINEER IN UHGIS PVT.LTD., R/O.H.NO.2-135/386, PLOT QUTHBULLAPUR (M),RR.DT &PER
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD.
2. KONDETI JYOTHI SURYA KUMARI, W/O. UDAYA BHASKAR, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, FATHERS PROTECTION,
R/O. D. NO. 24C-3-16, NEAR MANCHINELLATHOTA, PATTEBAD, ELURU URBAN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V RAGHAVAN
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.682 OF 2017
ORDER:
Heard Sri T.Surya Chaitanya, learned counsel representing Sri N.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/husband, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor representing the 1st respondent/State. None appeared for the 2nd respondent/wife.
2.
Learned counsel for revision petitioner/husband would submit that due to subsequent happenings pending revision petition, no orders are required in the revision case and the criminal revision case may be disposed of as infructuous.
3. The submissions of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/husband are placed on record.
4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for revision petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.02.2026
PSK
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
58
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:682 OF 2017
Date: 06.02.2026 W PSK