IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 92 of 2009 Decided on : 07.10.2026 Mehar Chand (deceased) through his LR ....Appellant Versus Preetam Singh (deceased) through his LRs and others. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the appellant. : Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate for the appellant. For the respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a) and 1(b). None for respondents no. 2 and 3. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Report of Tehsildar, Amb District Una, H.P. has been received. As per report, mutation no. 1855 was entered and duly sanctioned on 30.09.2026, as per compromise effected between parties before the learned Mediator. 2. In view of the report, the present appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise effected between the parties before the learned Mediator. The compromise shall form part of the decree. 2 3. The present appeal stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 07th October, 2026 (ravinder)