Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26402 (JHR)

PYARELAL TANTI @ PYARELAL KUMAR @ PIYARELAL TANTI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8647/2026 · 2026-09-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:28018 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8647 of 2026 ------ Pyarelal Tanti @ Pyarelal Kumar @ Piyarelal Tanti, Aged about 20 years, S/o –Bhola Tanti, R/o –Village –Kokrakhas, P.O. and P.S. –Balbedda, District –Godda (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Shekhar, Advocate : Ms. Kabisha Goenka, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16.09.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Meharma P.S. Case No.62 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 118(2), 109, 308(4), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27(2) of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder Jairam Mandal for non-fulfilment of demand of ransom of Rs.10,00,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade, as mentioned in para-8(viii) of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7748 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Godda, in connection with Meharma P.S. Case No.62 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16.09.2026 Sonu/