- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19039 WP No. 22821 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 22821 OF 2021 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENKATESHWRA ENTERPRISES NO.19, HOSAKERE HALLI, DATTATREYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 085 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI CHIKKANNA C., S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDENT NO.19, 2ND MAIN, DATTATREYANAGAR, HOSAKERE HALLI BANGALORE - 560 085 2. SMT. PADMAVATHI B., W/O CHIKKANNA C., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDENT NO. 19, 2ND MAIN, DATTATREYANAGAR, HOSAKERE HALLI BANGALORE - 560 085 3. SRI. KISHORE KUMAR C., S/O CHIKKANNA C., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDENT NO. .19, 2ND MAIN, DATTATREYANAGAR, HOSAKERE HALLI BANGALORE - 560 085 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A.T.MALLYA, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19039 WP No. 22821 of 2021 AND: THE AUTHORISED OFFICER CITY UNION BANK LIMITED NO.23/1, 17TH CROSS RD, M.C.ROAD, BEHIND MARUTHI MANDIR, M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 040 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON AN INTERIM APPLICATION IN I.A.NO.2460 OF 2021 (FOR STAY) FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 22(2) (g) OF THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ACT OF 1993, ON 08.11.2021 IN AN APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN S.A.NO.345/2021 ON THE FILE OF DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-2 BANGALORE, WITH A RIDER THAT STAY IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT THE PETITIONERS SHALL PAY A SUM OF RS.25,000,00-00 (RUPEES TWENTY FIVE LAKHS ONLY) ON OR BEFORE 26.11.2021 AND ANOTHER SUM OF RS. 25,000,00-00 (RUPEES TWENTY FIVE LAKHS ONLY) ON OR BEFORE 03.12.2021 INTO THE LOAN ACCOUNT WITH THE RESPONDENT BANK, WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’ , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19039 WP No. 22821 of 2021 ORAL ORDER When the matter came up on 06.04.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' today. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51