Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26396 (AP)

Chenna Krishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30032/2018 · 2026-02-08

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010627342018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30032/2018 Between: 1. CHENNA KRISHNA, S/O B.VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O CHANDURUVANDIAPALII VILLAGE, H/O KAMMAVARIPALLI, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANATAPUR DISTRICT. 2. NAGARAJU, S/O B.VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O CHANDURUVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE,H/O KAMMAVARIPALLI, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANATAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. CHANDURI JAYAMMA, W/O C.VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O CHANDURUVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, H/O KAMMAVARIPALLI, GORANTLA MANDAL, 2 JS,J W.P.No.30032/2018 ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. BABANNAGARI JAYAMMA, W/O JAYARAM, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPALLI VILLAGE, GORANTLA MANDAL, ANATAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in seeking to conduct survey the land and fix boundaries without issuing any notice to petitioners in respect of an extent of Ac.1.35 out of Ac.2.30 cents in Sy.No.59-2, and an extent of Ac.0.13 cents out of Ac.1.48 cents in Sy.No. 140-2 of Kammavaripahi Village Polam of Gorantla Man dal, Anantapur District pending adjudication of O.S.No.52 of 2017 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda without following any procedure known to law as illegal and without jurisdiction and against to principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the process of conducting survey by the official respondents in respect land in an extent of Ac.1.35 out of Ac.2.30 cents in Sy.No.59-2, and an extent of Ac.0.13 cents out of Ac.1.48 cents in Sy.No.140-2 of Kammavaripalli Village, Polam of Gorantia Mandal, Anantapur District pending adjudication of O.S.No.52 of 2017 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda, Anantapur District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.30032/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “…to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in seeking to conduct survey the land and fix boundaries without issuing any notice to petitioners in respect of an extent of Ac.1.35 out of Ac.2.30 cents in Sy.No.59-2, and an extent of Ac.0.13 cents out of Ac.1.48 cents in Sy.No. 140- 2 of Kammavaripahi Village Polam of Gorantla Man dal, Anantapur District pending adjudication of O.S.No.52 of 2017 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda without following any procedure known to law as illegal and without jurisdiction and against to principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and pass…” 2. The case of the petitioners is that the respondent is conducting a survey and fixing boundaries in their land to an extent of Ac.1.35 out of Ac.2.30 cents in Sy.No.59-2, and an extent of Ac.0.13 cents out of Ac.1.48 cents in Sy.No. 140-2 of Kammavaripahi Village Polam of Gorantla Man dal, Anantapur District, without issuing proper notice. It is noted that the 5th respondent has filed a suit in O.S.No.52 of 2017, on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court, Penukonda, and the petitioner is a party to this suit. 3. Since the suit filed by the respondents is pending, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file an application for demarcation and fixing of boundaries. Upon receipt of such application from the petitioners, the Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda, is directed to consider and pass appropriate 4 JS,J W.P.No.30032/2018 orders on the survey in accordance with the law, ensuring notice to both the parties. 4. With these observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 09.02.2026 RSD 5 JS,J W.P.No.30032/2018 93 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30032/2018 Dated: 09.02.2026 RSD