-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 159 INCOMP-1036-2026 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 AGYA RAM DECEASED THROUGH HIS LR & ANOTHER …Appellants Versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the appellant Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The aforesaid appeal was filed on 22.01.2026 by Mr. Vikas Bairagi, Advocate. The Registry had raised certain objections on the case file on 24.01.2026. The same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.07 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 3. A note was published by the Registry in the cause list, whereby the Advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with objections. As per office report, message at registered mobile number of the Advocate/his Clerk was also sent, however, nobody has come forward. 4. The instant case is shown in the cause list for today i.e. 07.07.2026, however, no one is present on behalf of the appellants. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 07.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.07 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document