HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15116 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 133 of 2026, under Sections 288, 109(1) of the B.N.S., Police Station- Naini, District- Prayagraj, during the pendency of the trial. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant was not named in the First Information Report (FIR) and his name surfaced for the first time in the statement of the informant. It is further submitted that the injured, in his statement, has given only a general role to the accused persons and has not specifically stated as to who threw the crude bomb at him. The learned counsel further contends that, as per medico- legal examination report, only abrasions were found on the person of the injured, which have been opined to have been caused by a hard and blunt object. The injuries were opined to be simple in nature. It is thus contended that the medical examination report is at odds with the ocular version. 4. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and has pointed out that the applicant has a criminal history of one other case, being Case Crime No.1085 of 2019, under Section 13-G of the U.P. Public Gambling Act. 5. Rejoining the issue, the learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant is not a previous convict. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhirendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj Kumar Yadav @ Lala Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) parties. 7. The applicant is not named in the FIR. The injured, in his statement, has not assigned any specific role to the applicant. The injuries found on the person of the injured in medico legal examination were simple in nature. The applicant is in jail since 18.03.2026. 8. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, and taking into account entire facts and circumstances, as enumerated above, I deem it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant. 9. Let the applicant – Neeraj Kumar Yadav @ Lala Yadav, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial Court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the Court concerned. 10. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his/her bail. 11. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. May 5, 2026 Kushal BAIL No. 15116 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad