Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26384 (HP)

KUNIKA v. Union of India

CWP/14959/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ajay Mohan Goel, Yogesh Jaswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:HHC:43490 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14959/2026 Date of decision: 06.10.2026 Kunika …..Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : M/s Anshul Jindal, Amanpreet Singh, Ragini Dogra and Rajul Chauhan, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI with Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 4 & 5. Mr. Aryansh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No. 7 and 8. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) After making his submissions for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate Authority with regard to issue which has been raised in the petition. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge 06th October, 2026. (yogesh)