1 CGHC010160702021 2026:CGHC:28936 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 507 of 2021 1 - Paro Devi Widow Of Late Awlesh Das Aged About 38 Years Resident Of - Tulsi Awas, Rajkishore Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 2 - Satyam Kumar Son Of Late Awlesh Das Aged About 15 Years (Minor), Through Their Natural Guardian - Mother - Paro Devi Resident Of - Tulsi Awas, Rajkishore Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Rohit Kumar Son Of Late Awlesh Das Aged About 14 Years (Minor), Through Their Natural Guardian - Mother - Paro Devi Resident Of - Tulsi Awas, Rajkishore Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Nandini Kumari Daughter Of Late Awlesh Das Aged About 8 Years (Minor), Through Their Natural Guardian - Mother - Paro Devi Resident Of - Tulsi Awas, Rajkishore Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Sundar Kumar Son Of Late Awlesh Das Aged About 4 Years (Minor), Through Their Natural Guardian - Mother - Paro Devi Resident Of - Tulsi Awas, Rajkishore Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Appellants versus 1 - Parmeshwar Son Of Mansai Paikra Aged About 30 Years (Driver Of Motor Cycle No. Cg 15 Cf 2134) Resident Of Village Jagatpur, P.S. Jairam Nagar, Distt. Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Maheshwar Son Of Mansai Paikra Aged About 45 Years (Owner Of Motor Cycle No. Cg 15 Cf 2134) Resident Of Village Jagatpur, P.S. Jairam Nagar, Distt. Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.07.13 14:57:13 +0530 2 3 - Branch Manager United India Insurance Company Limited, Bramh Road, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) Through The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Insurer Of The Motor Cycle No. Cg 15 Cf 2134) ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 10/07/2026 1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the impugned award dated 23.02.2021 passed by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, CG in Claim Case No.1073/2012. 2. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, which shows that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. 3. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai