Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26382 (AP)

KANCHARLA MAHESH BABU, GUNTUR DIST v. PROJECT DIRECTOR & ADDL. DPC, DWMA, MGNREGS, GUNTUR & 3 OT

WP/9549/2014 · 2026-03-30

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010630492014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9549/2014 Between: 1.KANCHARLA MAHESH BABU, GUNTUR DIST, S/O. ATCHYUTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOUEE, D.NO. 11-75, ANANDAPETA, PEDAKURAPADU (P&M), GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.PROJECT DIRECTOR ADDL DPC DWMA MGNREGS GUNTUR 3 OT, SCHEME (MGNREGS), AP. REP BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR & ADDL. DPC, DWMA, GUNTUR 2.TALLURI NAGARJUNA, S/O. MOHANA RAO., D.NO. 11-2013/1, ANANDAPETA, PEDAKURAPADU (P&M), GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 402 3.TALLURI PRABHUDASU RAVI, S/O. MOHANA RAO., D.NO. 11-2013/1, ANANDAPETA, PEDAKURAPADU (P&M), GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 402 4.GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or Direction(s) more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and call for the records pertaining to and connected with impugned appointment order issued vide Proc. Rc.No. 203/11-WS, dt. 18.02.2013 and set aside the same issued to the 2nd & 3rd Respondent as bad, illegal, unconstitutional and accordingly direct the 1st Respondent to appoint the Petitioner as Fiedl Asst. with all consequential benefits and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 11984 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1st Respondent to cancel the appointment order issued in Rc.No. 203/11-WS, dt. 18.02.2013 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.M S R CHANDRA MURTHY 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9549 of 2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 31.03.2026 KGM 3 82 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9549 of 2014 Dated 31.03.2026 KGM