C.Chitti Babu v. The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs
WP/28538/2013 · 2026-02-16
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26380 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26380 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010627332013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28538/2013 Between:
1. C.CHITTI BABU,, S/O.C.VARADARA RAJULU REDDY, CRPF FORCE NO.0415655191, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC:CRPF CONSTABLE/GENERAL DUTY (ON LEAVE), R/O.GOVINDAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, MHA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110001.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110003.
3. THE DY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, GROUP CENTRE, NEEMUCH (M.P).
4. THE COMMANDANT CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, 1ST CRPF, BATTALION, AIZAWL, MIZORAM - 796017.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARINDER PAL SINGH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
2. ANJALI AGARWAL The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
There is no representation for the petitioner today also.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Central Government appearing for respondents submits that the petitioner has challenged the proceedings dated 11.07.2013, whereby the 2nd respondent had addressed a show cause notice and also a direction to the petitioner to report to the unit for attending the departmental inquiry proceedings. No stay was granted and the matter was admitted by this Court on 03.10.2013.
3. The learned Standing Counsel further submits that the petitioner has deserted his job and also did not attend the departmental enquiry, though several notices were served on him. On account of the inaction of the petitioner, the petitioner was dismissed from service vide proceedings dated
20.11.2013. It is also submitted that the petitioner has so far not challenged the subsequent proceedings dated 20.11.2013.
4. Recording the submissions and taking the counter into consideration, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.17.02.2026 SR