Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2638 (RAJ)

MAKSOOD S/O PAPPU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3548/2026 · 2026-03-16

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11116] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3548/2026 Maksood S/o Pappu, R/o Jhiwana, Police Station Chaupanki, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Naharwal with Mr. Indra Sharma Mr. Nishant Chandel Mr. Bhupendra Singh Mr. Manoj Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 303/2024 registered at Police Station Chaupanki District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023 and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 118(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023 dismissed the bail application before it. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the main accused, namely Pappu, has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 23.05.2025, upon whom the grievous injury was [2026:RJ-JP:11116] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3548/2026] specifically attributed and assigned. It is further submitted that the other co-accused have also been enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that the main accused, namely Pappu, has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 23.05.2025, upon whom the grievous injury was specifically attributed and assigned; that the other co-accused persons have also been enlarged on bail, and looking to the overall facts and circumstance but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Maksood S/o Pappu shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /73