Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2638 (JHR)

NANCY BHENGRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/2067/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9232 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2067 of 2026 ------ Nancy Bhengra, W/o Samir Daud Topno, R/o Manohar Anand Cottage, Mahulsai, Po-Chaibasa, PS-Matkamhatu, Dist-West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, having its office at 1st Floor, Project Building Dhurwa, PO, PS- Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi. 2. The Secretary, Department of Administrative Reforms of Personnel, and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan Dhurwa, PO, PS-Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, School Examination and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan Dhurwa, PO, PS-Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi. 4. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC), having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, PO & PS-Namkum, Dist-Ranchi. 5. The Director, School Examination and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan Dhurwa, PO, PS-Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, PO & PS-Namkum, Dist-Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sonal Tiwary, AC to AG ------ 02/ 01st April, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner seeks appointment to the post of Sahayak Acharya. It is the claim of the petitioner that her name does not appear in the merit list. 3. Appointment is not a fundamental right. The petitioner has to establish that the petitioner was eligible and a person obtaining lesser marks than the petitioner in the category and subject of the petitioner has been appointed. 4. In this case, there is nothing on record to suggest as to what marks the petitioner has obtained and neither the petitioner 2026:JHHC:9232 2 has submitted that any person obtaining lesser marks than the petitioner in the category and subject of the petitioner has been appointed. 5. In absence of this basic information, no relief can be granted to this petitioner, accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 01.04.2026 S.K.D.Cp-2 Uploaded on 07.04.2026