Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26379 (AP)

Sriram Alluraiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32498/2025 · 2026-03-01

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010629912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32498/2025 Between: 1. SRIRAM ALLURAIAH, , S/O., SRIRAM ANAD, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O., DOOR NO. 3-145-8A-13-1 PRASANTH NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MA AND UP, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITY ADMINISTRATION, VADESWARAM MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTORCUMAPPELLANT, COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE MADANAPALLE MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MADANAPALLE, ANNMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in 2 the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in excluding the petitioners name from the promotion/counselling process under Roc.No.405788(1558)/2012/A3, dated 22.05.2025 and 23.05.2025, solely on the ground the FIR in Crime No.55/2023, is pending against the petitioner and without issuing any notice, show-cause or affording any opportunity of explanation, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, violative of the Principles of Natural Justice, and opposed to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to include the petitioners name in accordance with law in the Seniority/Promotion List for promotion from Junior Assistants/Typists (Category-v) to the post of Senior Assistant (Category-IV) in Ananthapuramu region, Andhra Pradesh and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to include the petitioner’s name in accordance with law in the Seniority/Promotion List for promotion from Junior Assistants/Typists (Category-v) to the post of Senior Assistant (Category-IV) in Ananthapuramu region, Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of WP.No of 2025 before this Hon’ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARADAM SAI LIKHITH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B SIVA SANKARA RAO SC For Services to Municipalities in rayalaseema, Nellore 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: In view of the letter dated 26.02.2026 addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, permission is accorded. 2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________ D. RAMESH,J Date:02.03.2026 Gk. 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH 39 WRIT PETITION No.32498 OF 2025 Date:02.03.2026 Gk