APHC010624272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3545/2025 Between: 1. PALETI GOPAL REDDY, W/O. RADHAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. VARIGONDA VILLAGE, T.P. GUDUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE, DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI HIMANSHU SHUKLA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, AT NELLORE. 2. SRI K RAMA CHANDRA MOHAN, COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GOLLAPUDI, OPP S. GRAND RESTAURANT, ONE CENTER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI A BALANJANEYULU, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 4. A VENKATA SRINIVASULU REDDY, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BHUVANESWARI SAMETA AND SRI MOOLASTHANAESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, MULAPET, NOLLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents/ contemnors and punish 2 them under Sections-10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Honble Court dated 01.09.2025 passed in W.P. 22967 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. D V SASIDHAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.3545 of 2025 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 01.09.2025, disposed of W.P.No.22967 of 2025, directing the respondent authorities to consider the application dated 05.07.2025 of the petitioner. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that respondent authorities have addressed the petitioner’s representation and rejected the claim of the petitioner. At this juncture, learned counsel for petitioner sought liberty to challenge the rejection order passed by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to petitioner to assail the rejection orders in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.03.2026 MH 4 51 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.3545 of 2025 06.03.2026 M MHH 5