VIJAY KUMAR ALIAS VIJAY TURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8592/2026 · 2026-09-17
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26370 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26370 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28227 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8592 of 2026
Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Turi aged about 30 years, son of Dinesh Turi, resident of village Dhrti, P.O. and P.S. Chandwa, Dist. Latehar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …
… Opp. Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Satish Keshri, APP
---
02/17.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 38 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 64(2) (m), 55(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case on 07.07.2026 and as per the allegation, the petitioner and the victim were in relationship and the victim has been repeatedly asking the petitioner to marry her but ultimately the marriage was not solemnized and there was some pressure on the informant to give an undertaking that she would not trouble the petitioner or his family members. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions of the petitioner is not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties there appears to be an element of consent with respect to the relationship between the petitioner and the victim and the dispute arose when the petitioner was to marry another girl. Considering the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
( 2026:JHHC:28227 ) 2
of learned A.C.J.M., Latehar, in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 38 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not disturb the victim in any manner whatsoever. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 17.09.2026 Uploaded on 19.09.2026 Binit/