APHC010607802013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13360/2013 Between: 1. Gajender Singh, Son of Rao Balbir Singh, Aged About 34 Years, 0/0 Vizag Chetak Flight (Cg), Icgs Vizag, C/O F.M.O., Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. Union Of India, Rep. By Its Secretary To Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, South Block, New Delhi - 110 001. 2. The Director General, Coast Guard Head Quarters, National Stadium Complex, New Delhi 110 001. 3. The Deputy Inspector General, Bureau Of Naviks, Cheeta Camp, Mankhurd, Mumbai - 400 088. 4. The Commanding Officer, Icgs Vajra, C/O Fmo, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the Letter No. 260/3, dated 02/04/2013 of the Deputy Inspector General, Bureau of Naviks, Mumbai, the 3rd respondent herein; as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16398 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned letter. 260/3, dated 02/04/2013 of the Deputy Inspector General, Bureau of Naviks, Mumbai, the 3rd respondent herein IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 73078 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P KAMLAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. RAMA RAO GANTANNAGARI The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 19.01.2026 PNS