R.Nagarajan v. The state rep by, The Superintendent of police
WP Crl./1174/2026 · 2026-05-14
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26367 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26367 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 1174 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL WP Crl. No. 1174 of 2026 R.Nagarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The state rep by, The Superintendent of police Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai
2. The state rep by, The Inspector of Police K2-Dusi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.
3. Renu ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition criminal is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the 1st respondent to 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.25/8E2 New Survey No.25/8E2A to an extent of 3706 Sq.Feet (8.51 Cents) situate at No.104 Azhinjalpattu Village, Cheyyar Taluk (Now Vembakkam Taluk), Tiruvannamalai District for fencing the land based on the petitioner’s representation dated 09.04.2026. For Petitioner(s): P.Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1174 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
ORDER This Writ Petition Criminal has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.25/8E2, New Survey No.25/8E2A to an extent of 3706 Sq.Feet (8.51 Cents) situated in No.104, Azhinjalpattu Village, Cheyyar Taluk (Now Vembakkam Taluk), Tiruvannamalai District for fencing the land based on the petitioner’s representation dated 09.04.2026.
2. This Writ Petition Criminal is disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents 1 and 2.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that they have received the representation from the petitioner and they will conduct enquiry and take appropriate decision in accordance with law.
4. Recording the said submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.04.2026 in accordance with law within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this
order after affording due opportunity to the 3rd respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1174 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. Accordingly, the writ petition criminal stands disposed of. No costs. 14-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nr To
1. The Superintendent of police Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai
2. Inspector of Police K2-Dusi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1174 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.DHANABAL, J. NR WP Crl. No. 1174 of 2026 14-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis