Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26362 (AP)

Gudla Venkata Rama Chandra Reddy, Alias G. Ramesh Reddy v. Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep. by

WP/26606/2013 · 2026-03-02

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010626762013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 26606/2013 Between: 1. GUDLA VENKATA RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, ALIAS G. RAMESH REDDY, S/O. LATE SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 29 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS, R/AT: D.NO.53-6-48, NEAR RAMALAYAM, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. 2. GUDLA ANJANEYULA REDDY, S/O. LATE SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/AT: D.NO.53-6-48, NEAR RAMALAYAM, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530016. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY, ITS COMMISSIONER, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT R.T.C. COMPLEX, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. B V RAMANA REDDY, S/O. LATE APPA RAO REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, FT/AT: D.NO. 53-22-34/19, CHAITANYA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MULUPURI USHA GOWRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S A V RATNAM 2. 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: None appeared for the Writ Petitioners. 2. Sri S.Vijaya Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation and Sri T.Karthik, learned Counsel for 2nd Respondent are present. 3. On 23.02.2026, when this Writ Petition was listed, none appeared for the Writ Petitioners. On the direction of this Court, the matter is listed today under the caption 8for dismissal9. Today also none appeared for the Writ Petitioners. 4. Having recorded the same and also having regard to the fact that the Writ Petition is pending on the file of this Court since the year 2013, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.03.2026 RMR 3 128 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.26606 of 2013 03.03.2026 RMR 4 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. W.P.No.26606 of 2013 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 03. 03.03.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J RMR 5