APHC010618692018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30093/2018 Between: 1. BONTHULA EASWARI, W/O. BONTHULA HARI VENKATA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.50-117- 17/9/3, R.K HOUSE, FIRST FLOOR, ASR NAGAR, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM. REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not granting Transferable Development Rights nor acquiring the property under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, in respect of plots 2 JS,J W.P.No.30093/2018 bearing plot Nos.410-A and 411-A in City Teachers Layout admeasuring an extent of 533 sq. yds in Sy.No.182/2 of Chinnamushidiwada Village of Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District which are falling under 80 feet proposed master plan road as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to acquire the property or issue Transferable Development Rights immediately in lieu of plots lost and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.04.2018 and reminder dated 21.05.2018 forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC) 2. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.30093/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 05.03.2026 RMR 4 JS,J W.P.No.30093/2018 220 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No:30093 OF 2018 Date: 05.03.2026 RMR