Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33910 WP NO.26542 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 26542 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST AND COOLIE, R/O RANGASWAMY GUDDA KAVAL BILI DEVALAYA, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVIGOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU - 572 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU SUB-DIVISION, TUMAKURU - 572 101. 4. THE TAHASILDAR TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572 101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33910 WP NO.26542 OF 2023
5. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER HULIDURGA RANGE, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 21ST JULY, 2020 AND 05TH AUGUST, 2020 VIDE ANNEXURES 'B' AND 'C' RESPECTIVELY INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representations dated 21st July, 2020 (Annexure-B) and 05th August, 2020 (Annexure-C) insofar as the petitioner is concerned for issuance of Saguvali Chit in respect of the subject land. 2. Heard Sri. Hanumanthappa Haravigowdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33910 WP NO.26542 OF 2023
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, it is forthcoming that the petitioner is claiming right over the property in question based on the grant order produced at Annexure-A.
4.
In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondents 2 to 4 are directed to consider the representations dated 21st July, 2020 (Annexure-B) and 05th August, 2020 (Annexure-C) insofar as the petitioner is concerned and take decision in the matter, after verifying the original records available in their office. It is made clear that the said exercise shall be concluded by the respondents 2 to 4, within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of the same to the petitioner in accordance with law. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39