Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
`
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.605 of 2026 Rajesh Garg
…………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Nikhil Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Devendra Pant, learned S.C. for the State.
3. Clarification Application (MCC No.2 of 2026) be treated as Correction Application. Correction Application (MCC No.2 of 2026)
4. Today the matter is listed on a correction application.
5. In the correction application, it has been submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that in the order dated 13.03.2026 in paragraphs nos.3 and 4, the words
“respondent-P.W.D.” be corrected as “respondent-Irrigation Department”.
6.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the said correction application is allowed.
7. Accordingly, the correction application is allowed.
8. Let the necessary correction be incorporated in the aforesaid judgment and order dated 13.03.2026 and the petitioner shall be supplied with a corrected copy of the order dated 13.03.2026, as per Rules.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
07.04.2026 SK