Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26327 (PNJ)

MARUYAMA MFG INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/19130/2026 · 2026-07-02

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-19130-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116 MARUYAMA MFG. INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. R. S. Randhawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Randhir Singh Thind, Advocate, M and Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The directing the third respondent regard to notice dated Deputy Commissioner of Police, Investigation, Ludhiana. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that into the complaint, FIR no.130 dated 01.07.2026 the Indian Penal Code, 18 Technology Act, 2000 3. stands disposed of 02.07.2026 Ad 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: MARUYAMA MFG. INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. R. S. Randhawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Randhir Singh Thind, Advocate, M and Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia third respondent to furnish a copy of the complaint/application regard to notice dated 14.05.2026, sent to the petitioner Commissioner of Police, Investigation, Ludhiana. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the complaint, FIR no.130 dated 01.07.2026 the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 66 and 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, has been registered at Police Station In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous and disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19130-2026 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 MARUYAMA MFG. INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. R. S. Randhawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Randhir Singh Thind, Advocate, Mr. Divyae Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus to furnish a copy of the complaint/application with 14.05.2026, sent to the petitioner - Company by the Commissioner of Police, Investigation, Ludhiana. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that upon enquiry the complaint, FIR no.130 dated 01.07.2026, under Sections 379 and 420 of and Sections 66 and 66(C) of the Information Police Station Dehlon, Ludhiana. In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous and (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Patel, Advocate mandamus with by the y 379 and 420 of and Sections 66 and 66(C) of the Information In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous and ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.07 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document