2 THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 509/2013 Between: 1. DASARI VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O (LATE) APPALA NAIDU, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: WORKING AS FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY -UNDER MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Proceedings of the 2nd Respondent vide letter No.1409/12/EGS/CS-1 Dated 16.07.2012 which is arbitrary, bad and illegal and contrary to law and non application of mind and violation of Article- 14 of the Constitution of India and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Service Conditions and the same liable to be set aside, consequently direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner as Field 3 Assistant of Lakshmipuram Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2013(WPMP 623 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order of the 2nd Respondent vide letter No.1409/12/EGS/CS-1 Dated 16.07.2012 by continuing the petitioner as Field Assistant of Lakshmipuram Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 170324 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 4 Order:- 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal before the District Collector, and the District Collector has passed an order dated 19.01.2013. 3. Considering the said submission, the proceedings dated 16.07.2012 have already been adjudicated by the competent authority in the appeal. As such, nothing further survives to be adjudicated on merits, insofar as the impugned proceedings in the writ petition are concerned. Accordingly, writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 05.02.2026 RMD 223 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 509/2013 05.02.2026 RMD